Photographic Processing
Best Management Practices For
Hazardous Materials/Waste Handling
Updated 09/21/06
Best Management Practices (BMPs) should be thought of as “good
housekeeping” practices. Within this industry we have different types
of businesses that have the same type of waste stream. Depending on
the locations of facilities and the pre-treatment requirements, you may be
allowed to dispose of the liquid waste stream into the sanitary sewer.
Silver is the regulated element in this waste stream and can be removed and
sold. Below are some guidance suggestions for your use in determining BMPs
for the facility. Each facility’s needs will depend on location and amounts
processed each day.
Below the waste heading you will find references to the
respective federal and state law. Federal laws for waste management can be found
in the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) - 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)
260-266, 268, 270-273, 279, 280-282, and 148. State laws for waste management
can be found in
Florida
Administrative Code (FAC) 62-730 and various
Florida Statutes (F.S.). State laws on waste management are typical more
stringent than federal laws.
PHOTOGRAPHIC INDUSTRY
[40
CFR 261 &
40 CFR 262
|
FAC 62-730.030 |
F.S. 403.721] and [40
CFR 401 |
FAC
62-660 |
F.S.
403.051]
GENERATION SOURCES AND DISPOSAL OPTIONS
Silver is the element used as the light-sensitizing
agent in most photographic materials and is present in photographic fixer
solutions as silver thiosulfate complex. The speed, color
and image quality is determined by the quantity of silver used in
fabricating the film. During the developing process, silver is
released in the fixer and the bleach/fix. In addition, silver is also
present in the wash water as a result of being carried from the different
processing tanks. Bleach solutions from black and white reversal processing
contain silver as soluble silver sulfate, and can also have significant
amounts of chromium as dissolved dichromate or chromic ion. The
concentration and distribution of silver in the photo processing solutions
depends on the type of photo processing system used, method of collection,
type of wash, and the amount of film processed per day.
Eventually, the solutions must be replaced, and the used solutions
disposed of. The used solutions can be stored in containers (DOT
approved) and hauled away by commercial hazardous waste haulers, or
discharged to a sewer system (Publicly Owned Treatment Works-POTW). If
the film processor elects to discharge the “waste” chemicals to a POTW, the
“waste” must be treated to reduce the silver content prior to discharge. To
receive permission to discharge this type of waste stream, contact your
sewer district’s “pretreatment officer”. Discharges to a septic system
will require approval from the Lee County Health Department. This type of
disposal is not recommended because of the potential to contaminate onsite
property and because these chemicals may destroy the biological process
necessary for septic tanks to continue effective operation. It is
important you know the difference between a POTW and an onsite septic system
in order to meet the requirements for proper disposal.
Several silver recovery treatment technologies have been developed
because of various factors. Disposal methods and variables such as
geographical location (sewer district) and hazardous waste generator
classification, of a particular photo processing lab. Selection of the
appropriate method depends on the size of the processing facility, the
amount of film processed, the waste disposal or discharge requirements, and
the capital available for equipment procurement. Recovering silver provides
an additional benefit of being a product to sell.
Methods of Reducing the Volume of Effluent Processed
1. Use film-processing chemicals which
require the least amount of liquid overflow, and have the lowest
replenishment rate. Check the manufacturers data sheets and make
comparisons to determine which chemicals will provide the optimum usage time
and the least amount of rinse water.
2. Use counter current rinsing, rather than
fresh water at each stage to reduce the amount of discharge. The
solutions should be tested frequently to ensure proper chemical content.
To increase the effectiveness of this technique, it may be advisable to use
squeegees to minimize carryover of contaminants into each rinse stage.
3. Cover processing tanks to reduce
evaporation, and subsequent need to reconstitute the solution.
4. To reduce the possibility of introducing
additional silver into the process solutions or the effluent, thoroughly
clean the system, drain lines, sumps, etc. to remove any buildup of deposits
which have accumulated over the years.
5. Monitor the effluent to the drain
frequently and consistently, keep records of the observations. Send
samples of all solutions to an independent testing lab to ensure an accurate
analysis for your process.
Methods of Measuring the Presence of Silver in Fixer
Solutions
1. Metal Replacement on Copper - A clean
copper strip is dipped into the fixer effluent, if silver is present, the
copper will change color. This method does not indicate the quantity
of silver in the solution, only that silver is present. Experienced
users, however, are able to judge the relative content based on the
appearance of the silver on the copper strip. Material cost is about
$1 per test and can be purchased from any metal supplier.
2. Silver Test Papers - The fixer effluent
will cause the test strip to change colors, depending on the silver content
of the fixer. This test is somewhat more comprehensive than the Metal
Replacement on Copper test, because of a direct correlation between distinct
color changes and silver content in the solution. Material cost is
about $2 per test; test papers can be purchased in photo supply shops.
3. Titration - This test is used to
precisely measure the silver content of the fixer, and must be conducted in
a laboratory by a trained technician. Cost per test runs $18-$50.
4. Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry - A
very precise method for measuring the silver content of the fixer; used only
by larger processors with extensive laboratory facilities. If the
solution is sent to a laboratory for testing, the cost per test is $20-$60.
Silver Recovery Methods
1. Metallic Replacement -This process
consists of passing the fixer or bleach-fix which contains silver through a
relatively inexpensive cartridge which is filled with steel wool. The
silver is recovered as sludge. Metallic replacement occurs when the
silver solution comes in contact with iron ( steel wool). The iron
goes into a solution as a dissolved ion, and the silver is reduced to its
metallic state and drops to the bottom as a sludge.
The metallic replacement method is particularly suited to smaller
processors due to its low cost *(typically $280-$350 per system, with an
annual operating cost of $150-$250). The cartridges are available from
several sources, are easy to install and require low maintenance.
Other advantages of this process: no electrical power is required, silver
concentrations in the effluent can be reduced to less than 5 mg/L.
2. Electroplating - The fixer is passed
through a unit which electrolitically causes the silver in the solution to
be plated to cathode as essentially pure silver. The remaining
solution may also require further processing by the Metallic Replacement
method if residual silver is present.
There are two basic techniques for installing an electroplating system.
A recirculating type of equipment is installed to allow the fixer to pass
through the unit on a continuous basis, and the recovered solution is
reused, or a system processes the fixer outside the loop. Both
electroplating methods of silver recovery require the use of considerably
more costly equipment than the metallic replacement method. In
addition, electrical power which is converted to direct current is required
to activate the system. *(Cost for a typical system is $3,000-$4,500; annual
operating cost runs $75-$250).
4. Ion Exchange - Very effective recovery
of silver from dilute solutions such as wash water, but it cannot be used to
recover silver from fixer or bleach fix. The solution is initially
pumped through a column of anion-exchange resin. Further processing is
required to recover the silver from the resin by electroplating or
precipitation methods. The Ion Exchange method is used primarily where
silver discharge must be strictly limited and requires costly equipment
*($6,500 - $7,00 per system; $550 - $770 annual operating costs).
5. Evaporation / Distillation - Water is
removed from the solution by evaporation, leaving the solid residue behind
for disposal or recovery. The evaporated water can be recovered by
condensation and disposed of to the POTW or reused. *(Typical system cost is
$2,600-$5,900, annual operating cost is $75-$150).
6. Chemical Precipitation - Metallic silver
and insoluble silver compounds can be precipitated from photo processing
solutions with chemical reagents such as sodium borohydride and sodium
sulfide. This method of recovering silver requires relatively
inexpensive equipment *(typically $165-$350 per system and $50-$100 annually
to operate), and is used primarily by manufacturers of photographic
supplies, rather than by photo processors.
7. Reverse Osmosis / Ultraflltration - The solution is forced
through a semi-permeable membrane under pressure. The water passes
through the membrane, while silver and other dissolved species are collected
on one side of the membrane. The sludge containing the silver can be
disposed of as hazardous waste, or processed further to recover the silver
for resale.
*(Typical costs and annual operating expenses are based on 100 to 200
rolls/day processing. Exact cost may vary).
This information was supplied by the Department of Environmental
Protection’s Pollution Prevention Program. If you have any questions, please
call the Division of Natural Resources Management, SQG Program at (239)
652-6126. The SQG Program is here to serve your interest in the proper
management